13 Comments
David Potter
1/31/2013 09:12:26 am
Thank you for defending my 2nd amendment rights. I applaud and SUPPORT you
Reply
Marc Perez
1/31/2013 09:48:06 am
The Constitution of the United States, The Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the State of Missouri make the right to keep and "BEAR ARMS" very clear without reservation. Surely the Founding Fathers of these documents knew very wel the need for this "RIGHT". No where in the Bill of Rights is such strong language as "Shall Not be Infringed" used to such a specific right. For those who would detract from this right I would ask "What other rights would you give up?" It is wel reognized that this righ tis about more than hunting or mearly possessing a firearm. Where this right has been revoked citizens ahev been held defenseless against their own Government and millions in past century have perished believing "It can't happen here." Truely an armed society is a polite society and an unarmed society are slaves or dead. Never forget the lessons of history. Self defense is a basic human right given to us by our country and by the almighty as well. We are all endowed with these inalienable rights. The Federal Government is given certain enumerated rights under the Constitution, they are exceeding what they are allowed to do. States have certain rights under the10th amendment, it is time they stood up to the Federal Government and it's breach of these rights.
Reply
Charles Ray
3/4/2013 10:53:08 pm
Agreed. Lets not forget "or the free exercise thereof" in the 1st!
Reply
1/31/2013 12:08:53 pm
Thank you Paul, keep up the fight. There are many naïve people out there, who have not a clue about the US Constitution and the people’s rights. I echo your sentiments. The Second Amendment is about the people being able to defend themselves from an overreaching tyrannical government. You have a God-given right to be able to defend yourself and your family. And the Founders did envision the people being able to arm themselves with the weapons of today, because they had fought a revolution against a tyrannical government. Where would this country be today if the Founders were not armed to fight the British? The Statists’ goal is for total confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens; the assault weapons ban, registration and amount of rounds are the slippery slope. The registration lets the governments know which law-abiding citizens own guns and how many guns they own making it easier for confiscation. And one bullet can kill. So, if the government implements the ban and the killing continues the government would have a reason for banning more guns and limit the amount of rounds till eventually, the government would call for total confiscation. For those people who think that will not happen need only look to what occurred after Katrina where the government disarmed law-abiding citizens of their guns.
Reply
Fred Berry
1/31/2013 01:49:32 pm
Good letter, Paul.
Reply
Will Wallace
2/1/2013 09:17:11 am
The complaint letter was absolute drivel. Rep. Curtman answered this stupidity with logic, reason, and the correctness of our Constitution. The complainer should be glad that an IQ test is not required for citizenship, he would be denied.
Reply
Gary Barthels
3/4/2013 09:43:04 pm
Thank you Paul,
Reply
Charles Ray
3/4/2013 10:39:24 pm
Thank you Mr. Curtman.
Reply
Thomas Potter
3/5/2013 07:23:34 am
Mr. Paul Curtman,
Reply
Ken Lockridge
3/5/2013 09:32:36 am
Paul, I thank you for defending my Constitutional rights. You have my complete support. Do not waiver in your efforts.
Reply
Bill Burt
3/5/2013 10:55:13 am
Paul, when you get letters like that, you know you are doing something right. When someone writes a letter on paper with a Southern Poverty Law Center logo on it, you realize they are either seriously brainwashed, or they are on the opposite side of liberty, since they were responsible for the false information on that report, calling us all terrorists.
Reply
Joseph Cervantes
3/11/2013 08:09:14 am
Poor Alan. He eludes to the fact that he is a Republican. This is why I intend to change my party affiliation by the next election cycle. It has become apparent of late that many in the GOP are willing to bend to the will of the opposition, regardless of the ultimate effect on personal liberties, in the mistaken belief that they will seem righteous for compromising. As a Marine, I too learned that compromise is bad in face of the mission and that silence is consent. What Alan fails to realize is that once we the people allow our government to create more and more restrictions on our God given rights (which are most definitely infringements), then this gives the government the strength to impose even more draconian measures to enforce its will upon us. I am starting to become ashamed of my party and, as I mentioned at the beginning, I intend to withdraw and pledge my support for another, more Constitutionally aligned, party. Semper Fidelis, Marines!
Reply
Dennis Hartmann
8/27/2015 03:14:19 am
Paul,
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
PodcastCategories
All
Archives
November 2013
|